Journal 7 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 6

Journal 7 - Essay Example A non-native exposed to a supportive environment is more likely to learn good English twice as first as a non-native exposed to a less supportive setting. Nevertheless, it is the primary responsibility for the non-natives to work hard to attain good pronunciations and grammar. They should practice on word pronunciations and be ready to learn from the natives. Pronouncing words slowly is a working solution towards overcoming an accent, and it has mutual advantage since the listener can understand, and the speaker perfects on better pronunciations of English words. Non-native speakers experience word selection problems while conversing with the other people. Poor word selection can lead to the listener failing to understanding the speaker or creation of wrong perceptions. The sentences below shows how of wrong pronunciation of words by non-natives create wrong understanding to the listener. Non-native: having a â€Å"desert† makes me happy and I look forward to having one each time. - Most non-natives have problems pronouncing the word dessert and pronounce it as desert that would create a new meaning to the sentence. Avoiding such words and using simple terms is necessary for the non-native to converse clearly. It would have been easier for a non-native to say â€Å"I enjoy taking something different after a main meal† A native speaker would have clearly understood the meaning Non-native: I â€Å"accept† the terms and conditions. – Non-natives have problems pronouncing the words accept and expect and in such a sentence, wrong pronunciation would affect the meaning to the listener. Using a different word such â€Å"I agree with the terms and conditions† would have been easier to pronounce, and the listener would have understood. In conclusion, the people around a non-native speaker can be very influential to how well he/she learns English. Correct choice of words is crucial for the effectiveness of dialogues and better

In what ways did US officials act to build a global order under US Essay

In what ways did US officials act to build a global order under US leadership, during and after World War Two, and what were the essential features of that order - Essay Example According to Hudson (2008), foreign policy is â€Å"the strategy or approach chosen by the national government to achieve its goals in its relations with external entities† (p. 12). Kaufman (2010), in turn, writes that the formulation of foreign policy denotes a process of reassessing certain policies – either previous or existing ones – as a result of changing circumstances. In general, the process of foreign policy decision making not only involves various domestic actors aiming for certain outcomes, most notably the national government, but is also highly dependent upon regional and global developments, factors, and forces, which constitute the particular international context. While most of the foreign policy decisions, whether being concerned with international trade, economic and diplomatic relations, immigration policies, etc., could be considered relatively routine, there are extraordinary ones where the stakes appear to be extremely high (Kaufman, 2010), like the formation of strategic alliances, decisions on whether to go to war or make peace, etc. On the other hand, even those foreign policy decisions, which are generally considered routine, inevitably attract more attention in election years, or when an extraordinary event or development occurs (Kaufman, 2010). Thus, as noted by Kaufman (2010), foreign policy is not only of concern to diplomats or bureaucrats but can affect everyone. Two conceptions of what the American type of government should consists in had been put forward at the very dawn of the United States – that of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton (Kaufman, 2010). While Jefferson didn’t conceal his animosity towards à ¢â‚¬Å"a very energetic government† (US Department of State, n.d.; Peterson, 1993), Alexander Hamilton, in turn, argued in favour of a strong relationship between the national government and big business, order, efficiency, as well as for the necessity of integrating the country – under favourable terms however – into the international system (Kaufman, 2010). Even though these views seem opposite to each other, historians aptly point out that Hamilton and Jefferson â€Å"often arrived at the same practical conclusion† (Harper, 2004, p.104). Not surprisingly therefore, the principles of economic development and non-interference in the European conflicts remained â€Å"a matter of consensus†, and the pillars of American foreign policy until the early twentieth century (Harper, 2004, p.104). Nevertheless, the purchase of Louisiana from France during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson and the War of 1812 signalled more or less a considerable shift in US foreign policy behaviour. The success of the purchase of Louisiana could be deemed to have set the precedent for buying the strip of land along the American–Mexican border in 1853 – named after the American general and diplomat James Gadsden, aka the Treaty of La Mesilla (Ibarra, 2004; Yale Law School, n.d.) – as well as Alaska from the Russian empire in 1867. The War